The act by the Independence Day held in the province of Tucumán headed by the President's Office found a speech played abysmally opposite subsequent legislative elections.
The call for dialogue can be seen as a strategy forged in the midst of a government morally worn to the bone. After 28 the results were minimized to the point of leaving almost ridiculed opposition. However, changes in the Cabinet became aware of the need for new air. However, is it the simple light makeup that far to clean up services are provided constant to ratify and deepen this peculiar management.
The ship has lost its sails and helm do not know where to go. The most dangerous of all is the presence of a mutinous crew on board that requires just cause course changes. Sad it is to be under the guidance of a fool.
were 193 years that elapsed between the cry of Independence and today's provincial groan indeed deafening. An interior that, despite past political times, flying for it the same old struggle: Equality and Autonomy over Buenos Aires. The national
sometimes be the worst of themselves naked. This thuggish essence of ninguneo constant behaves as if it were a village foreman, has been spraying the federal structures of our country. Many are the claims that were raised from different social and political sectors. Only now seem to be evaluated. The conflict with the field shattered the image of the President in full. Stubbornness left bewildered at society as a whole. At the same Committee on Agriculture of the Chamber of Deputies the ruling would have been willing to try initiatives opposed by the issue of export duties for beef and wheat. The Government also intends to revive the internal primaries and binding in both the Chief Justice stated in the act of July 9: "We must gather all the sectors because there is no room for partial discussions." No doubt this change of play together to address the new transversality that seeks to reunite the Peronism is in line with a reading of the facts from the very heart of government.
In the speech, the President articulated three areas: Economy, Democracy and Society.
"... requires us to all of us the history of Argentine speak with candor, with the sincerity with which he always I have addressed in every act of my life, not only as President of the Republic but also in all the institutional roles that have touched me play. I think that just one year of the Bicentennial should start a new stage of all Argentines. "Whoever initiates a new stage, or at least makes us believe it does, is the government. The eloquent sincerity thrown over board by the indifferent reading post-June 28.
Regarding the Economy said that the role to be fulfilled by the Government, the State is to promote the welfare of society. To promote the welfare of society does not mean punishing those who produce. No means to ban exports of grains. It does not involve driving discretion resources generated from the deductions. No funds involves using ANSES denying decent income retirees. In short, does not imply the benefit of a few-friends-to the detriment of the majority.
The luxury guest was Mr. Dialogue: "... calling on the wider dialogue with all sectors of national life ... unemployed and people without work is also part of the economy, perhaps not as economic actors themselves as social actors. "
is not a question of placing the most vulnerable as a shield to hide the genuine dialogue expanded. The term dialogue (from the Latin Dialogus) is defined by the Royal English Academy as "the conversation between two or more persons, which in turn express their ideas or feelings." The question is then what kind of dialogue referred to our President when excluding the provinces of a federal country forging a Unitarian with the discretionary use of resources to the head, when you minimize a public response reflected in the polls on June 28 moved past the hegemony of the model. Undoubtedly the Government refers to the dialogue of bream defined as the conversation without logical coherence. In all this comedy trappings, the President, do you believe what you say? Or says he does not believe?
added: "... The stage that the world is a very deep crisis, our own reality ... will require a great effort by all the dialogue ..."
no doubt prove a profound need for the Government itself facing a new dialogue stage. Will forcibly from December with the new House, and from now on, if we look to create a new climate of confidence in institutions.
The challenge is twofold. On the one hand, the Executive shall be open to dialogue, not as a mere gesture of conciliators but as the only means of building broad national consensus. And, on the other, the opposition must be available to bring all the necessary proposals to create the conditions of governance absent today.
As the Company invited citizen participation as a "... serious democratic reform inside the party, so that it is society that between the parties and may also decide ..."
How long the opposition has been demanding concrete proposals through political and electoral reform our system? Never too late for the government to support it. hope to open a new horizon to strengthen our institutions, make our nation more republican and participatory society.
Buenos Aires, July 12, 2009. Ledo Gretel Publications:
Mirador
National Journal On Line, Home,
http://www.miradornacional.com/?q=node/8529
, 12/07/2009
Chronicle and Analysis, On Line Journal,
http://www.cronicayanalisis.com.ar/otrasvoces.asp # 1242
, 07/13/2009
Parlamentario.com, Opinion ,
http://parlamentario.com/articulo-3786.html
, 13/07/2009
