The talk of a single ruling requires the posting of any hint of emerging leaders. It involves not allow the flourishing of new heads capable of playing in the loyalty of a people. Would jeopardize the power of the Prince, the arrogance in their decisions and the legitimacy of their actions. No doubt new figures allow undress signs of weakness, the beginning of a precipitous drop.
Machiavellian Prince free and safe only if you have a well-organized army of its own based on the recruitment of citizens. There must be another object, another thought, or cultivate another art rather than war, order and discipline of the army. The success and effectiveness in the maintenance of government are part of a strategic rationality aimed at achieving successful conservation of state power. This type of politics as the art of conquest, preservation and expansion of power justifies domination and subjugation of the weaker by the stronger.
A Prince, to govern when you must manage to weaken those who wield much power as they can cause problems in his government. In this sense, the paradigmatic combination between fox and lion, cunning and brute force calculator, are two sides of same coin. A coin which also calls itself coercion and consensus. A currency called hegemony in the background lurks the fear of the Prince to lose everything.
The Machiavellian Prince will present several ways: "to disarm his subjects to keep the state safe," keep the divisions;-power opposition against himself (for the purpose of staying in the media agenda);-win who finds it "suspicious."
Paradoxically, subsequent meetings held between the government and various political, social and economic of our country have blunted the deep fear of losing governance. The election results last June 28 have shown the deep erosion in popularity and with it the legitimacy of government actions. Now the strategy is different. Finally, the word "dialogue" seems to takes shape. Whites are the tricks employed to successfully achieve the desired goal: to place under their wings to different political forces and in the worst case, create cracks in structures that have seen with the candy presidential rejection.
At issue here is how it misses the "dialogue." It seeks to reach consensus in the field where the executive moves like a fish in water: the Pink. Among the virtues
del Príncipe se destaca el ser desconfiado y tener un buen ojo al momento de elegir a sus amistades. Creer inocentemente en un “diálogo” sin fronteras ni condicionamientos resultaría ingenuo. Implicaría subestimar al Príncipe. No cerrarse a los debates es la clave. Esta vez teñida de una contradicción en sí misma: la tropa debe reclutarse en campo ajeno. El Príncipe conoce bien su campo de acción. No cede espacios. No dialoga en el lugar donde se parla por excelencia: el Parlamento. Lo hace donde se ejecuta: la Casa Rosada.
No basta conseguir el poder sino permanecer en él. Conservarlo y consolidarlo son el secreto de la permanencia en el tiempo.
Entre una de sus acepciones, la Royal English Academy defines "meeting" as "the act of agreeing on one point, two or more things." While the word "dialogue" (Latin Dialogus) is defined as "the conversation between two or more people, which in turn express their ideas or emotions." We note that the "encounter" is more engaging than just a "dialogue" as goes one step further, to the point of reaching a coincidence and not just talk about it.
Buenos Aires, July 19, 2009. Ledo Gretel